· 8/25/2015
New York Republican State Committee v. Securities & Exchange Commission
Citations
- 419 U.S. App. D.C. 92
- 799 F.3d 1126
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14936
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the United States Courts of Appeals hold exclusive jurisdiction to hear challenges to an order issued by the agency
- noting that the D.C. Circuit has held identical statutory language to “vest[] the courts of appeals with exclusive jurisdiction to hear challenges to . . . [agency] orders”
- holding “the courts of appeals” have “exclusive jurisdiction” under 15 U.S.C. § 80b-13(a)
- discussing filing a protective claim during the statute of limitations period as indicative of diligence, without regard to whether such action is taken specifically during a period of extraordinary circumstance
- equitable tolling available in petitions for review “unless Congress has shown its intent” otherwise
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tatel, Pillard, Edwards
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.