Gold v. Laines (In Re Laines)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that January 4, 2004 schedules and statement of financial affairs could not be used to infer insolvency as of the date of transfers that occurred on March 22, 2001, March 26, 2001 and December 26, 2002
• holding that January 4, 2004 schedules and statement of financial affairs could not be used to infer insolvency as of the date of transfers that occurred on March 22, 2001, March 26, 2001 and December 26, 2002
• holding that January 4, 2004 schedules and statement of financial affairs could not be used to infer insolvency as of the date of transfers that occurred on March 22, 2001, March 26, 2001 and December 26, 2002
• “Insolvency determined as of one date may form the basis for the inference that insolvency existed on another date if the dates are relatively close in time and if no significant transactions occurred between the two dates”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).