Daneman v. Stanley (In Re Stanley)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that under Ohio’s UFTA, “‘[a]ctual intent’ may be present whether the transfer was motivated entirely or merely in part by a desire to hinder, delay or defraud creditors”
• declining to apply retrojection analysis to debtor's solvency given nearly two-year gap between date of alleged fraudulent transfer and petition date
• finding retrojection analysis inapplicable to a nearly two-year gap between the transfer and petition date
• “The refurbishing of the house never occurred, and therefore does not constitute value.”
• two-year gap between date of alleged fraudulent transfer and petition date
• nearly two year gap too long

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re: Thomas C. Wettach v.
  Third Circuit· 2016-01-20· cited 165×
• ASARCO LLC v. Americas Mining Corp.
  S.D. Texas· 2008-08-30· cited 81×
• Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. Ritz (In re Ritz)
  S.D. Texas· 2017-04-19· cited 25×
• Jones v. Mackey Price
  Utah Supreme Court· 2020-05-14· cited 9×
• United States v. Long
  N.D. Ohio· 2014-03-26· cited 7×
• Shubert v. Foulkrod (In re Bentivegna)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2019-02-13· cited 6×
• William D. Mundinger Trust v. Zellers
  N.D. Ohio· 2012-04-30· cited 4×

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• In Re: Daniel Fordu, Debtor. Harold A. Corzin v. Julie A. Fordu
  Sixth Circuit· 1999-12-22· cited 253×
• In Re Taubman
  S.D. Ohio· 1993-11-16· cited 105×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Antar
  Third Circuit· 2002-08-02· cited 99×
• Richard J. BRIDEN, Appellant, v. Anne FOLEY, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Appellee
  First Circuit· 1985-11-08· cited 80×
• Securities & Exchange Commission v. Antar
  D. New Jersey· 2000-11-17· cited 67×
• Stein v. Brown
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1985-07-24· cited 61×
• Rieser v. Hayslip (In Re Canyon Systems Corp.)
  S.D. Ohio· 2006-03-31· cited 55×
• In Re Jon Rey Hurtado and Denise Hurtado, Debtors. Charles J. Taunt v. Barbara Hurtado
  Sixth Circuit· 2003-08-28· cited 48×
• In Re: Triple S Restaurants, Inc., Debtor, J. Baxter Schilling, Trustee v. Donald M. Heavrin
  Sixth Circuit· 2005-08-30· cited 47×
• Ohio Corrugating Co. v. DPAC, Inc.
  N.D. Ohio· 1988-09-26· cited 39×
• United States v. Lawrence W. Berman, Marilyn Berman, and Forex Corporation
  Sixth Circuit· 1989-09-07· cited 35×
• Phillip Kelly, Trustee v. David Armstrong Hannah Armstrong Omaha State Bank David N. Armstrong, of the Estate of Theodore F. Armstrong
  Eighth Circuit· 2000-03-03· cited 35×
• Shubert v. Lucent Technologies Inc. (In Re Winstar Communications, Inc.)
  D. Delaware· 2005-12-21· cited 27×
• Dahar v. Jackson (In Re Jackson)
  First Circuit· 2006-08-18· cited 25×
• Dahar v. Jackson (In Re Jackson)
  D. New Hampshire· 2004-12-07· cited 24×
• Silagy v. Gagnon (In Re Gabor)
  N.D. Ohio· 2002-03-14· cited 24×
• Toledo Trust Co. v. Poole (In Re Poole)
  N.D. Ohio· 1981-11-03· cited 24×
• Welt v. Jacobson (In Re Aqua Clear Technologies, Inc.)
  S.D. Florida· 2007-01-31· cited 23×
• In Re Agnew
  D. Kansas· 2006-11-06· cited 22×
• Parlon v. Claiborne (In Re Kaylor Equipment & Rental, Inc.)
  E.D. Tennessee· 1985-12-04· cited 20×