Tavenner v. Smoot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that transfers of potentially exempt property are amenable to avoidance and recovery actions by bankruptcy trustees, rejecting the “no harm, no foul” rule
• when interpreting similar statute, 11 U.S.C. § 548, ‘‘courts have consistently held that a transfer motivated by love and affection does not constitute reasonably equivalent value’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).