Court of Claims· 9/14/1983
Goeppner v. United States
Citations
- 3 Cl. Ct. 345
- 1983 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1633
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- after initial refusal to correct record, plaintiff should not be credited for pursuing administrative remedies while adjudicative facts become stale
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Margolis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kirby v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1973-05-11· cited 148×
- Oceanic Steamship Co. v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1964-03-13· cited 115×
- Brundage v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1974-10-23· cited 114×
- Local 542, International Union of Operating Engineers v. HigginbothamW.D. Pennsylvania· 1975-06-02· cited 95×
- Eurell v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1977-12-14· cited 35×
- NeumannCourt of Claims· 1979-01-26· cited 9×
- Mariner v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1983-02-28· cited 6×
- Quirk v. United StatesCourt of Claims· 1981-05-29· cited 5×
Other cases named Goeppner v. United States
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.