Skip to main content
· 12/6/1985

Caravella v. United States

Citations

  • 9 Cl. Ct. 280
  • 1985 U.S. Claims LEXIS 870

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting an argument that the trial court “was 13 required to employ a less-restrictive means” prior to revoking a defendant’s pro per 14 || status
  • prima facie case established 13 where prosecutor used peremptory strikes to exclude all five black 14 potential jurors in venire

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.