Brundage v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the lack of mutuality in a contractual obligation — particularly in the context of arbitration — is an element a court may consider in assessing the substantive unconscionability of a contract term”
• citing, inter alia, Syl. Pt. 1, First Nat. Bank of Gallipolis v. Marietta Mfg. Co., 151 W. Va. 636 (1967)
• citing, inter alia, Syl. Pt. 1, First Nat. Bank of Gallipolis v. Marietta Mfg. Co., 151 W. Va. 636 (1967)
• citing, inter alia , Syl. Pt. 1, First Nat. Bank of Gallipolis v. Marietta Mfg. Co. , 151 W. Va. 636 , 153 S.E.2d 172 (1967)
• citing, inter alia , Syl. Pt. 1, First Nat. Bank of Gallipolis v. Marietta Mfg. Co. , 151 W. Va. 636 , 153 S.E.2d 172 (1967)
• answering certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).