Skip to main content
· 5/26/1992

Godfrey v. Perkin-Elmer Corp.

Citations

  • 794 F. Supp. 1179
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7508
  • 64 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 11
  • 1992 WL 114889

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • contending that subsections (c)(1) and (c)(2) both implicate abstention doctrines
  • contending that subsections (e)(1) and (c)(2) both implicate abstention doctrines
  • allowing state wrongful discharge and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims accompanying Title VII claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Devine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.