Gly Construction Co. v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Proper to consider evidence in addition to medical reports when determining the extent of loss of use
• after an essentially de novo trial in the circuit court, this Court does not review “a decision of the [Commission] but rather that of the circuit court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cozine v. Midwest Coast Transport, Inc.
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 36×
• Negussie v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-01-25· cited 16×
• Golding-Alleyne v. Department of Employment Services
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-09-24· cited 13×
• Getson v. WM BANCORP
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-06-12· cited 11×
• Pepsi Bottling Group v. Plummer
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-01-28· cited 4×
• Tubaya v. Tam Joines, Inc.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-01-08· cited 1×
• Falik v. Prince George's Hospital
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-11-01· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gillespie v. R & J Construction Co.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1975-07-08· cited 18×
• Blanding v. JH Andrews & Sons
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-05-12· cited 8×