Court of Appeals of Maryland· 6/12/1997
Getson v. WM BANCORP
Citations
- 694 A.2d 961
- 346 Md. 48
- 1997 Md. LEXIS 74
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that often evaluating physicians provide “an assessment of medical impairment” to assist the finder of fact in determining the degree of disability
- “The Commission must do more than merely adopt medical evaluations of anatomical impairment; the Commission must assess the extent of the loss of use by considering how the injury has affected the employee’s ability to do his or her job.”
- “The Commission must do more than merely adopt medical evaluations of anatomical impairment; the Commission must assess the extent of the loss of use by considering how the injury has affected 23 the employee‟s ability to do his or her job.”
- For compensability, “[t]he Commission must do more than merely adopt medical evaluations of anatomical impairment; the Commission must assess the extent of the loss of use by considering how the injury has affected the employee’s ability to do his or her job”
- shoulder is not part of arm
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bell, Eldridge, Rodowsky, Chasanow, Karwacki, Raker, Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Miller v. Comptroller of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-04-10· cited 21×
- Negussie v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-01-25· cited 16×
- M.C. DEAN, INC. v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, & ANTHONY LAWSON, IntervenorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-07-07· cited 10×
- Jacqueline Dent v. DOES/Providence Hospital Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-05-04· cited 9×
- Howard Univ. Hosp. v. Dist. of Columbia Dep't of Emp't Servs.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2019-01-31· cited 6×
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. WashingtonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-03-21· cited 3×
- Jacqueline Dent v. DOES & Providence Hospital Sedgwick Claims Mgmt. Servs.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-05-25
- Maldonado v. American AirlinesCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-07-25
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mobley v. Jack & Son PlumbingSupreme Court of Florida· 1964-11-04· cited 18×
- Continental Insurance Companies v. PruittTennessee Supreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 16×
- Taylor v. Pfeiffer Plumbing & Heating Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1983-04-13· cited 12×
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. RalphCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-11-09· cited 10×
- Gly Construction Co. v. DavisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-11-20· cited 9×
- Dye v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court· 1987-03-24· cited 7×
- Shebester-Bechtel, Inc. v. HigginbottomCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 1995-09-26· cited 2×
- First National Bank v. SohnCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-02-09· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.