Skip to main content
· 9/24/2009

Golding-Alleyne v. Department of Employment Services

Citations

  • 980 A.2d 1209
  • 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 474
  • 2009 WL 3028240

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying the rule that “[w]hen an agency concludes that the party with the burden of proof failed to meet that burden, we will reverse that determination only if the record compels a contrary conclusion to the exclusion of any other inference”
  • “The claimant had the burden of proof when presenting her case to the ALJ, and she must prove her case by a preponderance of the evidence.... Merely presenting ‘substantial evidence’ to support [a] claim is not necessarily enough to carry the burden of persuading the finder of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruiz and Fisher, Associate Judges, and Steadman, Senior Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.