Peterson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that admission of Department of Corrections business records did not violate defendant's Confrontation rights
• holding that Department of Correction's business records are not testimonial
• Department of Corrections records were not testimonial, and thus admission of those records to determine defendant's status as a prison releasee reoffender (PRR) for sentencing purposes did not violate his rights under Confrontation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Belvin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-08· cited 31×
• Parker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-31· cited 16×
• Card v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-28· cited 13×
• Bailey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-14· cited 7×
• Wyche v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-06· cited 1×
• Rollins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-11-21
• Bagley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-08-27

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• Blakely v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
• Gray v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-25· cited 50×
• Desue v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-25· cited 15×
• Gurley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-27· cited 13×
• McDowell v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-07-05· cited 12×
• Glover v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-30· cited 6×
• Arnett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-23· cited 2×