Supreme Court of Virginia· 2/26/1999
Glasco v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 513 S.E.2d 137
- 257 Va. 433
- 1999 Va. LEXIS 41
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying Belton “bright-line” rule to permit search of vehicle incident to lawful custodial arrest of vehicle’s recent occupant without regard to nature of offense for which arrest was made
- upholding search of automobile as valid incident to the arrest of defendant even though the defendant was detained in the back of a police cruiser and “thus arguably not in a position to seize a weapon or destroy evidence”
- driver was a recent occupant within the limits of the Belton rule where he parked his car, crossed the street and was 30 feet from vehicle when police first initiated contact
- evidence sufficient where defendant denied knowledge of drug in car before officer told him he found any
- applying Belton in 1999 to reach same conclusion as Thornton
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kinser, Lacy, Koontz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals· 2001-12-18· cited 738×
- Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2002-10-15· cited 274×
- McGhee v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia· 2010-11-04· cited 172×
- Emerson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2004-06-08· cited 160×
- Armstead v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2010-07-27· cited 92×
- Askew v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2003-03-18· cited 70×
- Clarke v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-04-25· cited 56×
- State v. DeanArizona Supreme Court· 2003-09-15· cited 43×
- Lovelace v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1999-11-05· cited 36×
- People v. StehmanIllinois Supreme Court· 2002-12-19· cited 35×
- State v. WanzekNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-08-25· cited 35×
- Scott v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2009-11-17· cited 30×
- United States v. Marcus ThorntonFourth Circuit· 2003-04-03· cited 17×
- Cason v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2000-07-11· cited 7×
- People v. StehmanAppellate Court of Illinois· 2001-07-30· cited 7×
- Hodnett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2010-05-11· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. WilkinsSuffolk County Circuit Court· 2000-08-10· cited 1×
- State v. GantCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-03-29
- State v. GantCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-09-20
- United States v. ThorntonFourth Circuit· 2003-12-30
Cites
46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 3,633×
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 3,538×
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 3,483×
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court· 1950-02-20· cited 2,080×
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 1,806×
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-12-20· cited 1,736×
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-10-12· cited 1,597×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1947-06-09· cited 1,370×
- Knowles v. IowaSupreme Court· 1998-12-08· cited 800×
- United States v. Michael Allen VaseyNinth Circuit· 1987-12-15· cited 201×
- Glasco v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-03-17· cited 103×
- United States v. Willie C. Cotton, Jr.Tenth Circuit· 1985-01-10· cited 95×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.