Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 4/18/2008

GJP, INC. v. Ghosh

Citations

251 S.W.3d 854
2008 WL 820758

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

determining statements that the vehicle was \in fine running order\ and that it had \strong mechanicals\ to be factual representations
determining statements that the vehicle was “in fine running order” and that it had “strong mechanicals” to be factual representations
noting that owner and seller of car “purported to have special knowledge of the facts’ and did ‘have superior knowledge of the facts’, which were not equally available to both parties” and concluding statements complained of were factual representations
key due-process inquiry is “whether the assertion of jurisdiction is reasonable in light of the nature of the defendant’s actions in the forum and the state’s interests implicated by them”
key due-process inquiry is \whether the assertion of jurisdiction is reasonable in light of the nature of the defendant's actions in the forum and the state's interests implicated by them\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patterson, Pemberton, Henson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

82 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.