Ginyard v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the “soundness” of counsel’s actions “present[s] a question of law rather than of fact”
• confirming the hearsay statement was properly excluded where there was no evidence that the declarant had personal knowledge of the subject of the statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).