United States v. Curtis Reynolds, William Parran. Appeal of William Parran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that inspector’s testimony that the codefendant told the defendant, “I didn’t tell them anything about you,” violated the Confrontation Clause
• holding phrase “I didn’t tell them anything about you” hearsay when offered to prove truth of implication that defendant was participant in crime
• holding statement 83 inadmissible because it was offered to \prove the truth of the assumed fact of defendant's guilt implied by its content.\
• “[S]tatements containing express assertions may also contain implied assertions qualifying as hearsay and susceptible to hearsay objections.”
• \[S]tatements containing express assertions may also contain implied assertions qualifying as hearsay and susceptible to hearsay objections\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).