Ginsburg v. Halpern

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Even if defendants had been shown to have volunteered to be witnesses and then [gave] false testimony against plaintiff [it] would not constitute a valid cause of action. In support of this we refer to the Restatement of Torts of the American Law Institute, Section 588.”
• “Even if defendants had been shown to have volunteered to be witnesses and then [gave] false testimony against plaintiff [it] would not constitute a valid cause of action . . . . We believe there is no civil action for perjury . 5 See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).