Skip to main content
· 7/12/1978

Jennings v. Cronin

Citations

  • 389 A.2d 1183
  • 256 Pa. Super. 398
  • 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • adopting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 590A (1976) and discussing Pennsylvania's judicial proceeding privilege
  • Testimony at legislative proceedings is absolutely privileged and may not serve as basis for defamation action
  • Testimony at legislative proceedings is absolutely privileged and may not serve as basis for defamation action
  • possible lack of subpoena irrelevant in determination that testimony before legislative committee absolutely privileged
  • possible lack of subpoena irrelevant in determination that testimony before legislative committee absolutely privileged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.