Gilmour v. Linn County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] local government’s interpretation of a land use regulation that implements state law is not entitled to defer- ence under ORS 197.829.” (Emphasis in original.)
• “[A] local government’s interpretation of a land use regulation that implements state law is not entitled to defer- ence under ORS 197.829.” (Emphasis in original.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Manchester Solar, LLC v. Yamhill County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-10-11· cited 3×
• Carroll v. Lane County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-05-14· cited 3×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• Siporen v. City of Medford
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-11-18· cited 41×
• Forster v. Polk County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-10-14· cited 24×
• Warburton v. Harney County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-05-23· cited 9×
• Kenagy v. Benton County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-09-09· cited 7×
• Davenport v. City of Tigard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-06-16· cited 5×
• City of Lake Oswego v. Albright
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-09-03· cited 5×
• Collins v. Klamath County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-06-25· cited 4×
• Green v. Douglas County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-08· cited 4×
• Riggs v. Douglas County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-03· cited 3×
• Friends of Creek v. Jackson County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-01-26· cited 1×
• Keicher v. Clackamas County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-08-08· cited 1×