Riggs v. Douglas County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “no principle of deferential review was applicable” in determining whether an activity was a “farm use” within the meaning of the statutory definition in ORS 215.203
• “If the evidence shows that OSIC did not specifically discuss with Primordial the Marijuana Exclusion’s limitation on the coverage sought. . . .”
• “If OSIC had notice that the Policy (or a prior policy) was being sought in order to comply with the insurance requirements of the Lease . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).