Skip to main content
· 5/23/2001

Warburton v. Harney County

Citations

  • 25 P.3d 978
  • 174 Or. App. 322
  • 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 755

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 859 P2d 1143 (1993) methodology to question of statutory interpretation in land use context
  • “The 'exclusively’ and 'except as otherwise provided’ language evidences a legislative intent to encourage the use of EFU-zoned land solely for farm use and to treat the permitted nonfarm uses in the listed statutes as exceptions to the use of that land for farming activities.”
  • “While it is true that a policy statement * * * should not provide an excuse for delineating specific policies not articulated in the statutes, such a general purpose statement may serve as a contextual guide for the meaning of a particular statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Deits, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.