· 5/23/2001
Warburton v. Harney County
Citations
- 25 P.3d 978
- 174 Or. App. 322
- 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 755
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 859 P2d 1143 (1993) methodology to question of statutory interpretation in land use context
- “The 'exclusively’ and 'except as otherwise provided’ language evidences a legislative intent to encourage the use of EFU-zoned land solely for farm use and to treat the permitted nonfarm uses in the listed statutes as exceptions to the use of that land for farming activities.”
- “While it is true that a policy statement * * * should not provide an excuse for delineating specific policies not articulated in the statutes, such a general purpose statement may serve as a contextual guide for the meaning of a particular statute.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Deits, Wollheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.