Warburton v. Harney County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 859 P2d 1143 (1993) methodology to question of statutory interpretation in land use context
• “The 'exclusively’ and 'except as otherwise provided’ language evidences a legislative intent to encourage the use of EFU-zoned land solely for farm use and to treat the permitted nonfarm uses in the listed statutes as exceptions to the use of that land for farming activities.”
• “While it is true that a policy statement * * * should not provide an excuse for delineating specific policies not articulated in the statutes, such a general purpose statement may serve as a contextual guide for the meaning of a particular statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Oregon Cable Telecommunications Ass'n v. Department of Revenue
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-10-06· cited 17×
• Sundermier v. State ex rel. Public Employees Retirement System
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-11· cited 9×
• Central Oregon Landwatch v. Deschutes County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-03· cited 7×
• Gilmour v. Linn County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-07-20· cited 5×
• Morgan v. Jackson Cnty.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-07· cited 4×
• 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Clackamas County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-06-23· cited 4×
• Stop Dump Coalition v. Yamhill County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-22· cited 3×
• Sellwood-Moreland Improvement League v. City of Portland
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-02· cited 2×
• Keicher v. Clackamas County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-08-08· cited 1×