Skip to main content

Gilley v. State

Citations

  • 996 So. 2d 936
  • 2008 WL 5191499

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court erred in using jury instructions that included the “and/or” conjunction and referred to codefendants who were being tried separately
  • trial court erred in repeatedly referring to defendant “and/or” two codefendants who were being tried separately

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fulmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.