Moton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding use of the “and/or” phrase in the instructions constituted fundamental error because “the jury could have found Mr. Moton guilty on the basis of Mr. Stallworth’s conduct alone”
• stating fundamental error results where the incomplete or inaccurate instruction “pertains to a genuinely disputed issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Nicholson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-27· cited 3×
• Zairon Jarquis Fussell v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-01-28· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Delva
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-02-21· cited 308×
• Reed v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-12-19· cited 206×
• Stewart v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-08-26· cited 141×
• Garzon v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-04-10· cited 74×
• Hunter v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2008-09-25· cited 45×
• Garzon v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-18· cited 38×
• Barrientos v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-06· cited 20×
• Gilley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-12· cited 6×
• Green v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-11-26· cited 4×