S.D. Alabama· 3/7/1989
Gilbert Equipment Co., Inc. v. Higgins
Citations
- 709 F. Supp. 1071
- 1989 WL 24579
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing Senate recommendations surrounding enforcement of “sporting purposes” test, which included advisory panel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pittman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gun South, Inc. v. BradyEleventh Circuit· 1989-06-30· cited 36×
- Thomas A. Demko and Penn Arms, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2000-06-09· cited 31×
- Citizens for the Scenic Severn River Bridge, Inc. v. SkinnerD. Maryland· 1991-12-04· cited 22×
- Sierra Nevada Forest Protection Campaign v. ReyE.D. California· 2008-08-01· cited 12×
- Gun South, Inc. v. BradyN.D. Alabama· 1989-04-26· cited 9×
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Forest ServiceE.D. California· 2007-09-05· cited 7×
- Demko v. United StatesFederal Claims· 1999-06-18· cited 7×
- Gilbert Equipment Co. v. HigginsEleventh Circuit· 1990-01-03· cited 6×
- In Defense of Animals v. United States Department of the InteriorE.D. California· 2012-11-15· cited 6×
- Appleton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 1999-08-31· cited 5×
- Shasta Resources Council v. United States Department of the InteriorE.D. California· 2009-04-07· cited 5×
- Conservation Law Foundation v. Federal Highway AdministrationD. New Hampshire· 2007-08-30· cited 4×
- Miree Construction Corp. v. DoleN.D. Alabama· 1990-01-24· cited 3×
- Olympic Arms v. MagawE.D. Michigan· 2000-03-31· cited 3×
- United States of America, Craig A. Thomasian, Claimant-Appellant v. One Sentinel Arms Striker-12 Shotgun Serial No. 001725, in RemNinth Circuit· 2005-07-26· cited 2×
- State v. United StatesN.D. Alabama· 2016-07-29· cited 2×
- Granat v. United States Department of AgricultureE.D. California· 2017-03-02· cited 2×
- Bezet v. United StatesE.D. Louisiana· 2017-03-17· cited 1×
- Springfield Inc v. Buckles, Bradley A.D.C. Circuit· 2002-06-14
- United States v. ThomasianNinth Circuit· 2005-07-26
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court· 1986-01-27· cited 28,671×
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 14,284×
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court· 1971-03-02· cited 7,564×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court· 1947-06-23· cited 3,981×
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 3,144×
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court· 1975-02-24· cited 2,871×
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-12-03· cited 2,566×
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court· 1973-03-26· cited 2,333×
- Ennis Nettles v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of FloridaFifth Circuit· 1982-05-17· cited 2,033×
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-06-30· cited 1,579×
- Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-05-24· cited 803×
- Malat v. RiddellSupreme Court· 1966-03-23· cited 477×
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court· 1945-05-07· cited 461×
- Albert H. Carter v. Robert Seamans, Jr., as Secretary of the Air ForceFifth Circuit· 1969-05-08· cited 206×
- Federal Power Commission v. Florida Power & Light Co.Supreme Court· 1972-02-22· cited 164×
- E & T Realty v. StricklandEleventh Circuit· 1987-10-26· cited 142×
- Jerry Lane Jurek v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentFifth Circuit· 1980-08-11· cited 133×
- Fleisher v. City of Signal HillSupreme Court· 1988-03-21· cited 97×
- Bass Angler Sportsman Society v. United States Steel Corp.N.D. Alabama· 1971-02-08· cited 63×
- Bank of Commerce of Laredo v. City National Bank of LaredoFifth Circuit· 1973-10-25· cited 56×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.