Skip to main content

Gibson v. State

Citations

  • 533 N.E.2d 187
  • 1989 Ind. App. LEXIS 61
  • 1989 WL 7136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding “‘recent’ is a lapse of time of less than twenty-four (24) hours”
  • “mere unexplained, exclusive possession of recently stolen property will sustain a conviction” and “possession remains unexplained when the trier of facts rejects the explanation [given]”
  • where defendant found with car two days later, defendant’s possession of a screwdriver, busted ignition, refusal to identify himself, and statement denying driving the car in spite of being apprehended leaving it were sufficient evidence to support defendant’s conviction for auto theft

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shields, Ratliff, Buchanan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.