Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 714 N.E.2d 671
  • 1999 Ind. App. LEXIS 1025
  • 1999 WL 432600

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that to determine whether a theft was “recent,” we also consider the “character of the goods, such as whether they are readily salable and easily portable or difficult to dispose of and cumbersome”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Robb, Darden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.