Skip to main content
· 12/15/2005

Buntin v. State

Citations

  • 838 N.E.2d 1187
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 2333
  • 2005 WL 3434645

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing auto theft conviction because defendant's mere control over the vehicle five days after it was stolen was insufficient to support the conviction
  • possession of a vehicle stolen five days earlier and turning around upon spotting a police officer did not support an auto theft conviction
  • judgment of theft sustained based on circumstantial evidence alone because it supported reasonable inference of guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Najam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.