Skip to main content
· 5/24/2002

Gettman v. Drug Enforcement Administration

Citations

  • 290 F.3d 430
  • 351 U.S. App. D.C. 344
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 9836
  • 2002 WL 1040572

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a magazine's readers and subscribers were not its members for purposes of associational standing
  • holding that a magazine’s readers and subscribers were not its members for purposes of associational standing
  • concluding that magazine lacked standing to bring suit on behalf of readers
  • holding that magazine readership is not the same as membership because the magazine has not shown the readers and subscribers “played a role in selecting its leadership, guiding its activities, or financing those activities”
  • concluding that magazine lacked standing to bring suit on behalf of readers
  • concluding that magazine lacked standing to bring suit on behalf of readers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Sentelle, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.