· 5/24/2002
Gettman v. Drug Enforcement Administration
Citations
- 290 F.3d 430
- 351 U.S. App. D.C. 344
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 9836
- 2002 WL 1040572
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a magazine's readers and subscribers were not its members for purposes of associational standing
- holding that a magazine’s readers and subscribers were not its members for purposes of associational standing
- concluding that magazine lacked standing to bring suit on behalf of readers
- holding that magazine readership is not the same as membership because the magazine has not shown the readers and subscribers “played a role in selecting its leadership, guiding its activities, or financing those activities”
- concluding that magazine lacked standing to bring suit on behalf of readers
- concluding that magazine lacked standing to bring suit on behalf of readers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Sentelle, Tatel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.