· 10/22/1999
Envirocare of Utah, Inc. v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Citations
- 194 F.3d 72
- 338 U.S. App. D.C. 282
- 30 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20143
- 49 ERC (BNA) 1513
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 26578
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “when it comes to statutes administered by several different agencies— statutes, that is, like the APA . . . —courts do not defer to any one agency’s particular interpretation”
- noting the reasons provided by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission support its interpretation of statute to deny standing to competitors asserting economic injury
- “In the absence of such a possibility, affirmance entails neither an improper judicial invasion of the administrative province nor a dispensation of the agency from normal responsibility.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edwards, Sentelle, Randolph
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.