George v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• for a prior consistent statement to be admissible under exception to rule excluding prior consistent statements for statements offered to rebut an express or implied charge of recent fabrication or improper influence or motive, statement must predate the motive to fabricate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kitchen v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1980-11-10· cited 71×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-06-09· cited 68×
• People v. Lambert
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-06-04· cited 35×
• State v. Fulton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-11-23· cited 22×
• Carroll v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-01-27· cited 22×
• Harris v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-10-21· cited 13×
• Gibbons v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 11×
• Sharp v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2005-02-23· cited 8×
• Frazier v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-02-12· cited 7×
• Worring v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1981-05-27· cited 6×
• Winkle v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2008-06-26· cited 5×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1977-10-17· cited 23×
• Rogers v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1908-12-21· cited 21×
• Derrick v. Rock
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1951-02-26· cited 19×