Appellate Court of Illinois· 6/4/1997

People v. Lambert

Citations

681 N.E.2d 675
224 Ill. Dec. 360
288 Ill. App. 3d 450
1997 Ill. App. LEXIS 352

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reaffirming -6- that charges of recent fabrication and motive to testify falsely are separate exceptions
despite the trial court’s warning that he “ ‘may be putting reversible error’ into the case,” the prosecutor offered prior consistent statement as substantive evidence
despite the trial court’s warning that he “ ‘may be putting reversible error’ into the case,” the prosecutor offered prior consistent statement as substantive evidence
prior consistent statement was admissible for rehabilitative purposes but could not be used substantively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLaren, Doyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.