Skip to main content

Winkle v. State

Citations

  • 286 S.W.3d 147
  • 374 Ark. 128
  • 2008 Ark. LEXIS 433

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] defendant must make a timely, specific objection, stating that ground, as a general objection is not sufficient to preserve a specific point. See Stone v. State, 371 Ark. 78, 82, 263 S.W.3d 553, 555 (2007
  • “[A] defendant must make a timely, specific objection, stating that ground, as a general objection is not sufficient to preserve a specific point. See Stone v. State, 371 Ark. 78, 82, 263 S.W.3d 553, 555 (2007) (quoting Howard v. State, 348 Ark. 471, 493, 79 S.W.3d 273, 286 (2002)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul E. Danielson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.