Supreme Court of Delaware· 8/17/2006
Gentile v. Rossette
Citations
- 906 A.2d 91
- 2006 Del. LEXIS 431
- 2006 WL 2388934
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A separate harm also results: an extraction from the public shareholders, and a redistribution to the controlling shareholder, of a portion of the economic value and voting power embodied in the minority interest.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holland, Berger, Jacobs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
126 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- F5 Capital v. PappasSecond Circuit· 2017-04-26· cited 250×
- Corwin as Trustee for Beatrice Corwin Living Irrevocable Trust v. British American Tobacco PLCSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2018-12-07· cited 201×
- Perry Capital LLC v. MnuchinD.C. Circuit· 2017-02-21· cited 184×
- Americas Mining Corp. v. TheriaultSupreme Court of Delaware· 2012-08-27· cited 178×
- Feldman v. CutaiaSupreme Court of Delaware· 2008-05-30· cited 142×
- El Paso Pipeline GP Company, LLC v. BrinckerhoffSupreme Court of Delaware· 2016-12-20· cited 125×
- Carsanaro v. Bloodhound Technologies, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2013-03-15· cited 91×
- In re Activision Blizzard, Inc. Stockholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2015-05-20· cited 74×
- Transeo S.A.R.L. v. Bessemer Venture Partners VI L.P.S.D. New York· 2013-03-29· cited 59×
- Gatz v. PonsoldtSupreme Court of Delaware· 2007-04-16· cited 58×
- NAF Holdings, LLC v. Li & Fung (Trading) Ltd.Supreme Court of Delaware· 2015-06-24· cited 58×
- Starr International Company v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2017-05-09· cited 57×
- Feldman v. CutaiaCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2007-08-01· cited 45×
- May v. CoffeySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-04-14· cited 41×
- Oliveira v. SugarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2017-01-20· cited 36×
- Potter v. Janus Investment FundS.D. Illinois· 2007-04-06· cited 34×
- Fortunee Massuda v. Panda Express, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2014-07-21· cited 32×
- Roberts v. Fed. Hous. Fin. AgencySeventh Circuit· 2018-05-03· cited 28×
- In re El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2015-12-02· cited 27×
- Saviano v. Westport Amusements, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-04-15· cited 25×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1983-02-01· cited 690×
- Tooley v. Donaldson, Lufkin, & Jenrette, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 2004-04-02· cited 479×
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1994-01-18· cited 456×
- Emerald Partners v. BerlinSupreme Court of Delaware· 1999-03-16· cited 343×
- Stroud v. GraceSupreme Court of Delaware· 1992-04-09· cited 246×
- Grimes v. DonaldSupreme Court of Delaware· 1996-04-11· cited 233×
- Kramer v. Western Pacific Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1988-08-22· cited 231×
- In Re Tri-Star Pictures, Inc., LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware· 1993-12-08· cited 169×
- Cavalier Oil Corp. v. HarnettSupreme Court of Delaware· 1989-09-05· cited 154×
- Agostino v. HicksCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2004-03-22· cited 67×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.