Feldman v. Cutaia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that claims are derivative in nature when harm arises solely out of stock ownership
• explaining that a suit alleging dilution through offering of stock for inadequate consideration is derivative
• stating that “the Delaware Supreme Court intended to confine the scope of [Gentile] to only those situations where a controlling stockholder exists”
• explaining that a claim “for mismanagement of corporate assets” is a derivative claim
• stating that “conclusory allegations need not be treated as true”
• stating that “conclusory allegations need not be treated as true”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).