Skip to main content
· 1/7/1994

Kudlacek v. Fiat S.P.A.

Citations

  • 509 N.W.2d 603
  • 244 Neb. 822
  • 1994 Neb. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that substantial factor test could be used in determining whether vehicle manufacturer’s failure to design crashworthy vehicle was proximate cause of passenger’s injuries notwithstanding evidence that driver was negligent
  • holding that substantial factor test could be used in determining whether vehicle manufacturer's failure to design crashworthy vehicle was proximate cause of passenger's injuries notwithstanding evidence that driver was negligent
  • discussing admissibility of expert opinion when expert used a computer program to reconstruct the path of the vehicle on the roadway
  • affirming admission of computer video simulation, in part, based on its conformity to actual dimensions of automobile, marks on roadway, speed, and angle at which vehicle left the roadway
  • applying the three Commercial Union factors to a computer-generated videotape of a single-car accident
  • courts have allowed videotape as illustration where judge told jury that videotape is only visual illustration and not proof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, Caporale, Fahrnbruch, Lanphier, White, Shanahan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.