General v. E. Roseman Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting “brought or taken” in a statute concerning appeals from a workmen’s compensation board to include appeals mailed within the appeal period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Jolliffe
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-28· cited 21×
• Szura v. Zoning Hearing Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-01-26· cited 15×
• General v. E. Roseman Co.
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-08-11· cited 13×
• Strawley v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-06-02· cited 9×
• Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Gimbel Bros.
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-05-23· cited 8×
• Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Budd Co.
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-03-14· cited 6×
• Hyland v. Gonzales.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2017-03-02· cited 2×
• Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Johnson
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-07-11· cited 2×
• UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEW v. Jolliffe
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-10-28

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Luckenbach v. LUCKENBACH
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-06-28· cited 36×
• Pater v. Superior Steel Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1919-01-04· cited 26×
• Crucible Steel Co. of America v. Skwarko
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-06-19· cited 14×
• Walsh v. Tucker
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-11-26· cited 10×
• General v. E. Roseman Co.
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-11-20· cited 7×