General v. E. Roseman Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• wherein we held that mailing of the Board’s decision constituted service, starting the running of the twenty day appeal period, but receipt of the appeal of this Court constituted filing of the appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• General v. E. Roseman Company
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-04-17· cited 9×
• Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Budd Co.
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-03-14· cited 6×
• Steven Kulovits Trucking & State Workmen's Insurance Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-02-18· cited 3×
• Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Johnson
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-07-11· cited 2×
• Findlay Refractories Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-05-30· cited 1×
• Moyer v. City of Pottsville
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-05-20
• Borough of Grove City v. Commonwealth
  Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board· 1975-04-10

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Luckenbach v. LUCKENBACH
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-06-28· cited 36×
• Shellem v. Springfield School District
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-11-13· cited 9×