General DataComm Industries, Inc. v. Arcara

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that obligation was material \[b]y contractual definition\ because the agreement provided for termination upon breach of the obligation
• holding that a contract was executory because it specified that the failure to perform certain duties entitled the counterparty to terminate the contract, and “by contractual definition, therefore, such obligations were material”
• deferring to a contract’s definition of material breach

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named General DataComm Industries, Inc. v. Arcara

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• General Datacomm Industries, Inc. v. Arcara
  Supreme Court· 2005-11-28
• General Datacomm Industries, Inc. v. Arcara
  Supreme Court· 2005-11-28