In Re Exide Technologies

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, under New York law, “when a breaching party 'has substantially performed' before breaching, 'the other party's performance is not excused.”
• noting that under New York law “the issue of whether a party has substantially performed is usually a question of fact and should be decided as a matter of law only where the inferences are certain.”
• noting that under New York law “the issue of whether a party has substantially performed is usually a question of fact and should be decided as a matter of law only where the inferences are certain.”
• considering appeal of order holding agreement was executory contract and rejection of the agreement terminated creditor’s rights under the agreement
• explaining that expired indemnity obligation is not material
• \We also now conclude that we will not confine the [substantial performance] doctrine to construction and employment contract cases.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• In Re Nortel Networks, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 2011-12-29· cited 57×
• In Re W.R. Grace & Co.
  Third Circuit· 2013-09-04· cited 52×
• Sunbeam Products, Inc. v. Chicago American Manufacturing, LLC
  Seventh Circuit· 2012-07-09· cited 25×
• Lewis Brothers Bakeries Inc. v. Interstate Brands Corp. (In Re Interstate Bakeries Corp.)
  Eighth Circuit· 2014-06-06· cited 15×
• In Re Trump Entertainment Resorts, Unite Here Local 54
  Third Circuit· 2016-01-15· cited 12×
• Boy Scouts of America and Delaware BSA LLC v.
  Third Circuit· 2025-05-13· cited 12×
• In re Crumbs Bake Shop, Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 2014-10-31· cited 8×
• Law Debenture Trust Co. of N.Y. v. Tribune Media Co. (In re Tribune Media Co.)
  D. Delaware· 2018-07-30· cited 7×
• In re Ellipsat, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2012-09-26· cited 7×
• In re Tempnology, LLC
  D. New Hampshire· 2015-11-12· cited 7×
• Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology LLC (In re Tempnology LLC)
  First Circuit· 2016-11-18· cited 7×
• Noble Energy, Inc. v. Conocophillips Company
  Texas Supreme Court· 2017-06-23· cited 6×
• Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC
  First Circuit· 2018-01-12· cited 6×
• In re Rappaport
  D. New Jersey· 2014-10-01· cited 5×
• Lewis Bros. Bakeries Inc. v. Interstate Brands Corp. (In Re Interstate Bakeries Corp.)
  Eighth Circuit· 2012-08-30· cited 2×
• Rafool v. Evans (In re Central Illinois Energy, L.L.C.)
  C.D. Illinois· 2012-11-20· cited 2×
• In re Bluberi Gaming Technologies, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2016-09-07· cited 2×
• Mitsuwa Corp. v. Orama Hospitality Grp., Ltd. (In re Orama Hospitality Grp., Ltd.)
  D. New Jersey· 2019-06-13· cited 1×
• Alliance Industries, Inc. v. Longyear Holdings, Inc.
  W.D. New York· 2012-02-28· cited 1×
• The Weinstein Co Holdings v.
  Third Circuit· 2021-05-21

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco
  Supreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 1,085×
• Lipsky v. Commonwealth United Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1976-12-01· cited 322×
• Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. v. Allegheny Energy, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2007-08-31· cited 318×
• Nicholas v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 246×
• Lubrizol Enterprises, Inc. v. Richmond Metal Finishers, Inc., in Re Richmond Metal Finishers, Inc., Debtor
  Fourth Circuit· 1985-03-15· cited 205×
• Davis v. United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-03· cited 171×
• Sharon Steel Corporation v. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation, Intervenor: James W. Toren, Trustee
  Third Circuit· 1989-04-06· cited 144×
• In Re Columbia Gas System Inc.
  Third Circuit· 1995-03-10· cited 141×
• In Re Lavigne
  Second Circuit· 1997-06-02· cited 106×
• In Re: Cellnet Data Systems, Inc., Debtor Schlumberger Resource Management Services, Inc. v. Cellnet Data Systems, Inc
  Third Circuit· 2003-04-30· cited 82×
• Hadden v. Consolidated Edison Co.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1974-05-01· cited 80×
• In Re Old Carco LLC
  S.D. New York· 2009-06-19· cited 40×
• General DataComm Industries, Inc. v. Arcara
  Third Circuit· 2005-05-16· cited 32×
• In Re Chipwich, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1985-10-24· cited 26×
• Anderson Clayton & Co. v. Alanthus Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-01-10· cited 19×
• In Re HQ Global Holdings, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2003-02-25· cited 16×
• In Re Exide Technologies
  D. Delaware· 2006-04-03· cited 16×
• Thompkins v. Lil' Joe Records, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 2007-02-05· cited 9×
• Raima UK Ltd. v. Centura Software Corp. (In Re Centura Software Corp.)
  N.D. California· 2002-07-24· cited 8×
• In Re Ron Matusalem & Matusa of Florida, Inc.
  S.D. Florida· 1993-08-13· cited 7×