Skip to main content
· 10/17/1995

In Re Thinking MacHines Corporation, Debtor. Thinking MacHines Corporation v. Mellon Financial Services Corporation 1

Citations

  • 67 F.3d 1021
  • 34 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 567
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 28928
  • 28 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 72
  • 1995 WL 600211

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that in the section 365 context, “bankruptcy courts may enter retroactive orders of approval, and should do so when the balance of equities preponderates in favor of such remediation.”
  • discussing the shopping center amendments in the context of commercial landlords and an office building lease
  • “nothing in our holding today precludes a bankruptcy court, in an appropriate section 365(a) case, from approving a trustee’s rejection of a nonresidential lease retroactive to the motion filing date”
  • section 365(d)(3) is a “marked departure” from section 503(b)(l)’s allowance only of costs necessary to the preservation of the estate
  • landlord moved for immediate possession of premises approximately six weeks after motion to reject lease
  • “[W]e hold that a rejection of a nonresidential lease under section 365(a) becomes legally effective only after judicial approval has been obtained.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Stahl, Gorton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.