Appellate Court of Illinois· 2/21/1992

Geier v. Hamer Enterprises, Inc.

Citations

589 N.E.2d 711
226 Ill. App. 3d 372
168 Ill. Dec. 311
1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

circuit court conducts two-step analysis of whether the judgment is final and whether certain discretionary factors, such as the contingent nature of a third-party claim for contribution, favor appealability under Rule 304
circuit court conducts two-step analysis of whether the judgment is final and whether certain discretionary factors, such as the contingent nature of a third-party claim for contribution, favor appealability under Rule 304
Rule 304(a)’s policy and language is patterned after Rule 54(b)
Rule 304(a)’s policy and language are patterned after Rule 54(b)
Rule 304(a)'s policy and language is patterned after Rule 54(b)
ultimately applying federal factors to Rule 304(a) appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.