Skip to main content
· 2/21/1992

Geier v. Hamer Enterprises, Inc.

Citations

  • 589 N.E.2d 711
  • 226 Ill. App. 3d 372
  • 168 Ill. Dec. 311
  • 1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 242

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • circuit court conducts two-step analysis of whether the judgment is final and whether certain discretionary factors, such as the contingent nature of a third-party claim for contribution, favor appealability under Rule 304
  • circuit court conducts two-step analysis of whether the judgment is final and whether certain discretionary factors, such as the contingent nature of a third-party claim for contribution, favor appealability under Rule 304
  • Rule 304(a)’s policy and language is patterned after Rule 54(b)
  • Rule 304(a)’s policy and language are patterned after Rule 54(b)
  • Rule 304(a)'s policy and language is patterned after Rule 54(b)
  • ultimately applying federal factors to Rule 304(a) appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.