Lorraine C. Cullen v. Joseph P. Margiotta, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that confronting issues in a “unified package” is particularly appropriate when the “adjudicated and pending claims are closely related and stem from 8 essentially the same factual allegations”
• explaining that presentation of a “unified” appeal “is particularly desirable where . . . the adjudicated and pending claims are closely related and stem from essentially the same factual allegations”
• “We have strongly urged that ... district courts should not merely repeat the formulaic language of the rule ....”
• a “unified” appeal “is particularly desirable where ... the adjudicated and pending claims are closely related and stem from essentially the same factual allegations”
• a “unified” appeal “is particularly desirable where ... the adjudicated and pending claims are closely related and stem from essentially the same factual allegations”
• “A similarity of legal or factual issues will weigh heavily against entry of judgment under [Rule 54(b)]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).