Geeslin v. State Farm Lloyds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the insurer had filed its then-current rate as its \initial rate\ under former art. 5.26-1
• construing “just, reasonable, adequate, not excessive, and not unfairly discriminatory for the risks to which it applies” to mean that “the rate must allow for a ‘reasonable profit’ but not one that is ‘unreasonably high in relationship to the insurance coverage provided’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).