Texas Department of Insurance v. State Farm Lloyds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing agency order as arbitrary and capricious where “order was based in part on at least one legally irrelevant factor”
• recognizing courts “do not defer to the agency’s conclusory or unsupported suppositions”
• reversing agency order as arbitrary and capricious where “order was based in part on at least one legally irrelevant factor”
• reversing agency order as arbitrary and capricious where \order was based in part on at least one legally irrelevant factor\
• “[I]f the Commission has failed to follow the clear, unambiguous language of its own regulation, we must reverse its action as arbitrary and capricious.”
• “Even if supported by substantial evidence, however, an agency’s order may be arbitrary and capricious . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).