Fratzke v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an evidentiary hearing is not required unless facts are alleged which, if proved, would entitle a petitioner to the requested relief
• stating that an evidentiary “hearing is not required unless facts are alleged which, if proved, would entitle a petitioner to the requested relief’
• concluding that ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim contained merely a “generalized allegation[] of incompetence”
• concluding that ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claim contained merely a “generalized allegation[] of incompetence”
• stating that “generalized allegations of incompetence [of counsel] are not reason for an evidentiary hearing”
• stating that a petitioner’s allegations that “trial counsel did not properly handle hearsay and inconsistent testimony and ‘coached’ the accomplice” were too generalized to warrant an evidentiary hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).