White v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the law of the case doctrine prevents a defendant from challenging his sentence in a rule 3.800 motion after failing to prevail on the same issue in his plenary appeal
• a per curiam decision, even without opinion, establishes the law of the case on the same issues and facts which were raised or which could have been raised

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Raley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-10· cited 61×
• Scott v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-01-13· cited 48×
• White v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-01-18· cited 15×
• Scott v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-04-30· cited 5×
• Canty v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-07-27· cited 4×
• Johnson v. Circuit Court, Eighteenth Judicial Circuit
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-03· cited 3×
• Isom v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-31· cited 3×
• Damian L. Kelly v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-06-10

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sanders v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-28· cited 26×
• State v. Stabile
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-01-04· cited 18×
• Canales v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-13· cited 10×
• Gaskins v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-02-25· cited 6×