Moskey v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the State meets its burden to establish a valid inventory search by demonstrating (1) an inventory policy exists and (2) the officers followed the policy
• stating the State need not prove impoundment and subsequent inventory was the least intrusive means of securing and safeguarding the vehicle, nor must it prove 22 that the officers investigated possible alternatives to impoundment
• “A police officer’s inventory of the contents of an automobile is permissible under the Fourth Amendment if conducted pursuant to a lawful impoundment of the vehicle.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).