Gardner v. State
Citations
- 55 Fla. 25
Syllabus
<p>x. Under an indictment for homicide, where the State seeks to introduce a dying declaration of the deceased in evidence, it should be first shown to the satisfaction of the court that at the time the declarations were made the deceased not only considered himself in imminent danger, but that he evidently believed he was without hope of recovery. The circumstances under which the statements were made must be shown, in order that the court may determine whether the statements are admissible as dying declarations.</p> <p>2. The utmost care .and caution should be exercised by the court in the admission of dying declarations, since such dec- ’ larations are necessarily a species of hearsay evidence and their admission in evidence is an exception to the general rule of evidence which requires that the witness shall be sworn and the defendant given privilege of cross-examination.</p> <p>3. Whether a sufficient and proper predicate has been laid for the admission in evidence of dying declarations is a preliminary matter for determination by the trial court, being a mixed question of law and fact, and the judgment of .such court thereon is entitled to great weight, every presumption being in favor of its correctness, but such ruling is subject to re dew by an appellate court, though it will not be disturbed, unless it clearly appear to be erroneous. If the appellate court is clearly convinced that the trial court committed error in ad- * mitting such dying declarations, it is its duty to pass upon such ruling, when the same is properlyassignedaserror.andto reverse the judgment if necessary for the furtherance of justice.</p> <p>4. Dying declarations are substitutes for sworn testimony and must yield to the general rules governing the admissibility of evidence, and nothing can be admitted as evidence in such a declaration to which the declarant would not be permitted to testify on the witness-stand, had he survived. *</p> <p>5. It is error to admit in evidence a copy of a
Judges: Shackleford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lowman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-06-10· cited 40×
- Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-01-15· cited 31×
- Copeland v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-06-15· cited 23×
- Folks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-02-26· cited 23×
- Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-11-25· cited 14×
- Coatney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1911-01-15· cited 9×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1912-01-15· cited 6×
- Mills v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-06-29· cited 2×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lester v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1896-01-15· cited 79×
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1869-07-01· cited 51×
- Turner v. StateTennessee Supreme Court· 1891-01-22· cited 34×
- Morrison v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1900-01-15· cited 32×
- Richard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1900-06-15· cited 26×
- Clemmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1901-01-15· cited 25×
- Roten v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1893-01-15· cited 14×
- Newton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-01-15· cited 9×
- Green v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1901-06-15· cited 7×
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1905-06-05· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.