Copeland v. State
Citations
- 58 Fla. 26
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Law — Dying Declarations, When Admissible — Opinion Evidence on Medical Questions.</p> <p>1. To render dying declarations admissible, tbe trial judge must be fully satisfied tbat tbe deceased 'declarant, at tbe time of their utterance, knew that bis death was imminent and inevitable, and tbat be entertained no bope of recovery. This absence of all bope of recovery, and appreciation by tbe deceased of bis speedy and inevitable death is a preliminary foundation tbat must always be laid to make such declarations admissible. It is a mixed question of law and fact for tbe judge to decide before permitting tbe introduction of tbe declaration itself. It is not necessary tbat such preliminary foundation should be proven by express utterances of tbe deceased, but it may be gathered from any circumstance or from all tbe circumstances of the case.</p> <p>2. Tbe settled’ rule is tbat to give an opinion on medical questions, one may be qualified by study without practice, or by practice without study.</p>
Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-08-29· cited 110×
- Delap v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-09-15· cited 100×
- Lowman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-06-10· cited 40×
- State v. JarrellUtah Supreme Court· 1980-02-19· cited 28×
- Folks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-02-26· cited 23×
- Britt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1924-12-18· cited 17×
- Malone v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1916-06-27· cited 16×
- Wright v. SchulteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-14· cited 15×
- Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-11-25· cited 14×
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-10-30· cited 14×
- Hawkins v. SchofmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1967-11-28· cited 13×
- Cruce v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1924-04-15· cited 8×
- Pearson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-11-23· cited 2×
- Mills v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-06-29· cited 2×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lester v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1896-01-15· cited 79×
- People v. MillardMichigan Supreme Court· 1884-03-06· cited 62×
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1869-07-01· cited 51×
- Healy v. Visalia & Tulare R.R.California Supreme Court· 1894-03-13· cited 36×
- Clemmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1901-01-15· cited 25×
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1897-01-06· cited 18×
- Gardner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-01-15· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.