Skip to main content

Copeland v. State

Citations

  • 58 Fla. 26

Syllabus

<p>Criminal Law — Dying Declarations, When Admissible — Opinion Evidence on Medical Questions.</p> <p>1. To render dying declarations admissible, tbe trial judge must be fully satisfied tbat tbe deceased 'declarant, at tbe time of their utterance, knew that bis death was imminent and inevitable, and tbat be entertained no bope of recovery. This absence of all bope of recovery, and appreciation by tbe deceased of bis speedy and inevitable death is a preliminary foundation tbat must always be laid to make such declarations admissible. It is a mixed question of law and fact for tbe judge to decide before permitting tbe introduction of tbe declaration itself. It is not necessary tbat such preliminary foundation should be proven by express utterances of tbe deceased, but it may be gathered from any circumstance or from all tbe circumstances of the case.</p> <p>2. Tbe settled’ rule is tbat to give an opinion on medical questions, one may be qualified by study without practice, or by practice without study.</p>

Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Parkhill, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.