Skip to main content

Carter v. State

Citations

  • 711 N.E.2d 835
  • 1999 Ind. LEXIS 356
  • 1999 WL 339288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to consider a mitigating circumstance which was not raised at sentencing
  • concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it identified defendant’s attempted molestation of his sister as an aggravating circumstance
  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to consider a mitigating circumstance which was not raised at sentencing
  • holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by considering evidence at sentencing hearing that defendant had attempted to molest his three-year-old sister a few weeks before murdering another child
  • reducing a sixty-year sentence for murder to fifty years because of the defendant’s “very youthful age”
  • reducing a sixty-year sentence for murder to fifty years because of the defendant’s “very youthful age”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boehm, Shepard, Sullivan, Selby, Dickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

105 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.